Contrast this:
"A male voice came over the public-address system Sunday evening at a store in Washington Township, in southern New Jersey, and calmly announced: "Attention, Walmart customers: All black people, leave the store now." (Yahoo News, Mar 18).
"Shoppers in the store at the time said a manager quickly got on the public-address system and apologized for the remark. And while it was unclear whether a rogue patron or an employee was responsible for the comment, many customers expressed their anger to store management."(UPDATE - they have arrested a 16-year old boy for the prank. And they refuse to release his race. Hmm.. My gut feeling is that he is hispanic. If he were white, then anti-white officialdom would have been more than happy to confirm this fact and feed into the anti-white anger of minorities. But if he's another minority - well, this doesn't fit the MSM's narrative of a happy rainbow coalition among minorities, so the information must be suppressed for the 'best of intentions.' The thinking being 'Let's just let everyone assume he's white.')
With this:
"Blonde teenager Anika Smit, (17) was found murdered at her Pretoria home on March 11, 2010—with her hands and forearms chopped off."
"The girl’s limbs are missing—cut off just below the elbows—said South African police constable William Mahlaole. Nothing else was robbed." (South African paper Beeld, Mar 12)(UPDATE - nothing to update. This isn't a priority for the police in South Africa or the MSM.)
A harmless prank at a Wal-Mart store receives not just national attention - but international attention! - I've just read this story translated into the language of my country of residence, while a little white girl is victimized in what appears to be a racially charged murder and this just gets a blip in a small newspaper. Hypersensitive blacks go into hysteria and whites fall into throes of hand-wringing and soul-searching about the deep-rooted nature of white racism when the most harmless of incidents occurs, but when a black brutally murders a little white girl, whites just 'suck it up' and draw no larger conclusions about black-on-white crime. Ho-hum. Move on. Nothing new here.
And yet South Africa has seen a surge in racially charged attacks since the country's return to majority rule in 1994. Approximately 3,000 white farmers have been brutally murdered and many of them tortured (boiled to death, etc.).
It's gonna be a brave new world - an Orwellian one where the heavy hand of government falls hard on politically incorrect pranks while brutal black-on-white crimes go ignored.
How will whites fare in America's majority-minority future? Well, I would ask why are we waiting to find out?? Are the benefits of diversity so enormous that it's worth betting our children and grandchildren's future on the sliver of hope that America will be the sole exception to the one and only constant in human history - ethnic strife?
Thankfully we (currently) have a right to bear arms in the US. But this does us little good if we're locked up when we do choose to defend ourselves. Last year a couple of black teenagers shot at a white pharmacist in Oklahoma City as they tried to rob his store (video footage here). He shot back in self-defense and killed one of the robbers, but then was promptly arrested for murdering a 'child' - to borrow the words of the district attorney who made the decision to charge him. If the jury is white he may get some sympathy from whites tired of being victimized by blacks. But what will happen when the country turns majority-minority and most of the jurors are minorities? Like in the O.J case, whitey can expect little sympathy - blacks and hispanics will use the legal system to right 'historical wrongs' irrespective of the specifics of the individual case at hand.
So we can choose not to defend ourselves and become a victim, or we can choose to fight back and be charged as the aggressor. We're damned if we do and damned if we don't.
God save us all.
No comments:
Post a Comment